4.7 Review

Treatment of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 258-263

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.026

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Comorbidity; Treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: More than 20% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) show lifetime comorbidity for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but treatment of BD-OCD is a clinical challenge. Although serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRls) are the first line treatment for OCD, they can induce mood instability in BD. An optimal treatment approach remains to be defined. Methods: We systematically reviewed MEDUNE, Embase, PsychlINFO and the Cochrane Library and retrieved data on clinical management of comorbicl BD-OCD patients. Pharmacologic, psychotherapeutic and others alternative approaches were included. Results: Fourteen studies were selected. In all selected studies BD-OCD patients received mood stabilizers. In the largest study, 42.1% of comorbid patients required a combination of multiple mood stabilizers and 10.5% a combination of mood stabilizers with atypical antipsychotics. Addition of antidepressants to mood stabilizers led to clinical remission of both conditions in only one study. Some BD-OCD patients on mood stabilizer therapy benefitted from adjunctive psychotherapy. Limitations: Most studies are case reports or cross-sectional studies based on retrospective assessments. Enrollment of subjects mainly from outpatient specialty units might have introduced selection bias and limited community wide generalizability. Conclusions: Keeping in mind scantiness and heterogeneity of the available literature, the best interpretation of the available evidence appears to be that mood stabilization should be the primary goal in treating I3D-OCD patients. Addition of SRI agents seems unnecessary in most cases, although it may be needed in a minority of BD patients with refractory OCD. (C) 2014 Elsevier By, All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据