4.7 Article

A long-term follow-up of clinical response and regional cerebral blood flow changes in depressed patients treated with ECT

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 235-243

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.005

关键词

Major depression; Follow-up; Electroconvulsive therapy; Clinical response; Regional cerebral blood flow

资金

  1. Research and Developmental Committee of Landstinget Blekinge
  2. Ellen and Henrik Sjobrings Foundation
  3. Thure Carlssons Foundation
  4. OM Perssons Donation Foundation
  5. Greta and Johan Kocks Foundation
  6. Trolle Wachtmeister Foundation for Medical Research
  7. ALF (Swedisch Government)
  8. Crafoords Foundation
  9. Alzheimer Foundation, Sweden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most potent therapy. We investigated the clinical response and regional cerebral blood flow changes in depressed in patients treated with (ECT) in a repeated longitudinal study. Method: Forty-nine patients (21 men and 28 women) with a mean age 61 years underwent ECT. Forty-one patients grading improvement after the initial ECT-series (responder group) were compared with eight, grading no improvement (non-responder group). The patients underwent neuropsychiatric ratings, measure of clinical response (defined as >= 50% reduction of pre-treatment depression score) and measure of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Results: The responder group had an initial 60-82%, and the non-responder group a 30-64% clinical response throughout the follow-up. The non-responder group showed more reported depression (p=.003), and vegetative anxiety (p=.024), with a generally higher left temporal rCBF (p=.045). Limitations: The retrospective approach and the small sample-size. Conclusion: Patients with no subjective improvement after ECT had lesser objective clinical response, more sustained reported depression with anxiety features, and higher left temporal rCBF. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据