4.7 Article

Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) for outpatients with bipolar disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 146, 期 1, 页码 132-136

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.06.032

关键词

Social cognition; Bipolar disorder; Psychotherapy; Theory of mind; Cognitive bias

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Health (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias) [FIS 09/90966]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Patients with bipolar disorder show social cognition deficits during both symptomatic and euthymic phases of the illness, partially independent of other cognitive dysfunctions and current mood. Previous studies in schizophrenia have revealed that social cognition is a modifiable domain. Social cognition and interaction training (SCIT) is an 18-week, manual-based, group treatment designed to improve social functioning by way of social cognition. Method: 37 outpatients with DSM-IV-TR bipolar and schizoaffective disorders were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU)+SCIT (n=21) or TAU (n=16). Independent, blind evaluators assessed subjects before and after the intervention on Face Emotion Identification Task (FEIT), Face Emotion Discrimination (FEDT), Emotion Recognition (ER40), Theory of Mind (Hinting Task) and Hostility Bias (AIHQ). Results: Analysis of covariance revealed significant group effects for emotion perception, theory of mind, and depressive symptoms. The SCIT group showed a small within-group decrease on the AIHQ Blame subscale, a moderate decrease in AIHQ Hostility Bias, a small increase in scores on the Hinting Task, a moderate increase on the ER40, and large increases on the FEDT and FELT. There was no evidence of effects on aggressive attributional biases or on global functioning. Limitation: No follow up assessment was conducted, so it is unknown whether the effects of SCIT persist over time. Conclusion: This trial provides preliminary evidence that SCIT is feasible and may improve social cognition for bipolar and schizoaffective outpatients. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据