4.7 Article

Early functional impairment in bipolar youth: A nested population-based case-control study

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 142, 期 1-3, 页码 208-212

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.04.028

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Functioning; Disability; Major depression; Epidemiology

资金

  1. National Institute for Translational Medicine
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil
  3. Astra-Zeneca
  4. Eli Lilly
  5. Janssen-Cilag
  6. Servier
  7. CNPq
  8. CAPES
  9. NARSAD
  10. Stanley Medical Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The objective of this report is to evaluate functioning in bipolar disorder in a population-based sample of young adults (18 to 24 years old). To this end, people with bipolar disorder were compared with matched participants with only depressive episodes and control subjects without a history of mood episodes. Methods: Case-control study nested in a population-based sample. Caseness was confirmed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. The Functioning Assessment Short Test was used as a measure of general functioning. A multivariate model was elaborated to account for potential confounders. Results: The sample consisted of 231 subjects. Both bipolar disorder (coef=0.60, SE=0.14, p<0.001) and major depression (coef=0.44, SE=0.14, p=0.001) were associated with functioning in the multivariate model. Current depressive symptoms appeared to influence functioning in those with major depression (Z=2.05, p=0.04), but not in those with bipolar disorder (Z=0.78, p=0.43). Limitation: Neuropsychological testing was not performed and we see it as an important limitation of this study. Conclusion: This population-based study further reinforces the notion that functional impairment is a fundamental characteristic of bipolar illness. It is present from early stages and is not completely explained by mood symptoms. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据