4.7 Article

Hippocampal atrophy in first episode depression: A meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 134, 期 1-3, 页码 483-487

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.057

关键词

Depression; Structural magnetic resonance imaging; Hippocampus; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health
  3. Medical Research Council [G90/96, G9817803B] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G90/96, G0802594] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Reduced hippocampal volume has been consistently observed in major depressive disorder. Hippocampal volume loss is particularly evident in patients with recurrent and chronic depression. However, the reports in first episode depression have been mixed. Methods: We performed a random effects meta-analysis to establish whether hippocampal atrophy exists from disease onset. We included magnetic resonance imaging studies of hippocampal volume in patients with first episode major depressive disorder and matched healthy controls. Results: A total of 7 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, representing independent observations in a total sample of 191 patients and 282 healthy controls. The cumulative analysis revealed hippocampal volume loss in patients with first episode depression relative to controls in both the left (standardised mean difference, SMD = -0.41, 95% Confidence Interval: [-0.78; -0.03], z = -2.14, p = 0.0321) and right (SMD = -0.53[-0.98; -0.09], z = -2.38, p = 0.0173) hippocampi. The average volume reduction was -4.0% in the left and -4.5% in the right hippocampus. Conclusions: Hippocampal volume loss in first episode depression is consistent with a neurodevelopmental model of depression, advocating hippocampal structure as a potential diagnostic neurobiomarker for depression. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据