4.7 Article

A French network of bipolar expert centres: A model to close the gap between evidence-based medicine and routine practice

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 131, 期 1-3, 页码 358-363

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.11.013

关键词

Bipolar disorders; Expert centre; Clinical practice network; Treatment guideline; Translational research

资金

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicate (INSERM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bipolar disorders are a major public health concern. Efforts to provide optimal care by general practitioners and psychiatrists are undermined by the complexity of the disorder and difficulties in applying clinical practice guidelines and new research findings to the spectrum of cases seen in day to day practice. Method: A national network of bipolar expert centres was established. Each centre has established strong links to local health services and provides support to clinicians in delivering personalized care plans derived from systematic case assessments undertaken at the centre. Results: A common set of diagnostic and clinical assessment tools has been adopted at eight centres. Evaluations are undertaken by trained assessors and cross-centre reliability is monitored. A web application, e-bipolar (c) is used to record data in a common computerized medical file. Anonymized data is entered into a shared national database for use in multi-centre audit and research. Conclusions: Instead of offering treatment advice based on clinical practice guidelines recommendations for selected sub-populations of patients (a 'top-down' approach), the French bipolar network offers systematic, comprehensive, longitudinal, and multi-dimensional assessments of cases representative of general bipolar populations. This 'bottom-up' strategy may offer a more efficient and effective way to transfer knowledge and share expertise as the referrer can appreciate the rationale underpinning suggested treatment protocols and more readily apply such principles and approaches to other cases. The network also builds an infrastructure for clinical cohort and comparative-effectiveness research on more representative patient populations. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据