4.7 Article

Clinical utility of Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS) among patients with first episode depression

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 127, 期 1-3, 页码 199-202

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.05.023

关键词

Depression; Personality disorder; Screening interview; Comorbidity

资金

  1. Danish Research Councils [2052-03-0025]
  2. Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Copenhagen (Danish Research Councils) [2052-03-0025]
  3. Lundbeck Foundation [R67-2010-6154] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Personality disorder frequently co-occurs with depression and seems to be associated with a poorer outcome of treatment and increased risk for recurrences. However, the diagnosing of personality disorder can be lengthy and requires some training. Therefore, a brief screening interview for comorbid personality disorder among patients suffering from depression would be of clinical use. Method: The present study aimed to assess the utility of the Standardised Assessment of Personality - Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS) as a screen for personality disorder in a population of patients recently diagnosed with first episode depression. A total number of 394 patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of a single depressive episode were sampled consecutively via the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register during a 2 years inclusion period and assessed by the screening interview and, subsequently, by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. Results: We found, that a cut-off of 3 on the screen correctly identified the presence of comorbid personality disorder in 73.1% of the patients. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.80 and 0.70, respectively. Limitations: The findings cannot be generalized to patients outside hospital settings. Conclusion: The study provides evidence for the clinical utility of SAPAS as a screening interview for comorbid personality disorder in a population of patients with a primary diagnosis of depression. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据