4.7 Article

The impact of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder on bipolar disorder patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 123, 期 1-3, 页码 71-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.005

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Trauma; Comorbidity; Quality of life

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. Center for Study and Treatment of Affective Disorders (CETTA), UFBA, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Available data regarding posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in bipolar disorder (BD) are scarce and usually from a limited sample size. The present report was carried out using the Brazilian Research Consortium for Bipolar Disorders and aimed to examine whether patients with BD and comorbid PTSD are at an increased risk for worse clinical outcomes. Methods: A consecutive sample of bipolar I outpatients from two teaching hospitals in Brazil was recruited. Patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Young Mania Rating Scale, 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and quality of life instrument WHOQOL-BREF. Participants were divided into three groups: a. bipolar patients with PTSD, b. bipolar patients exposed to trauma without PTSD, and c. bipolar patients with no trauma exposure. Results: Of the 405 patients who consented to participate, 87.7% completed the survey. All three groups were similar in terms of demographic parameters. The group with comorbid PTSD reported worse quality of life, more rapid cycling, higher rates of suicide attempts, and a lower likelihood of staying recovered. Limitations: The cross-sectional design excludes the opportunity to examine causal relationships among trauma, PTSD, and BD. Conclusions: The findings indicate that PTSD causes bipolar patients to have a worse outcome, as assessed by their lower likelihood to recover, elevated proportion of rapid cycling periods, increased risk of suicide attempts, and worse quality of life. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据