4.7 Article

Psychiatric reactions to isotretinoin in patients with bipolar disorder

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 122, 期 3, 页码 306-308

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.09.005

关键词

Isotretinoin; Bipolar disorder; Dermatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Isotretinoin (Accutane(R)) has been available for the treatment of severe cystic acne for about twenty-five years There have been several reports of adverse psychiatric reactions to isotretinoin, including depressive symptoms and suicide However, there have been only three case reports of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) who experienced an untoward psychiatric side effect while receiving isotretinoin treatment In this study, the psychiatric side effects from isotretinoin were assessed in a larger group of BD patients than has previously been reported Methods A retrospective chart review of 300 BD outpatients identified ten patients treated with isotretinoin Results Nine of these ten patients experienced a significant worsening of mood symptoms, and three developed suicidal ideation Eight experienced a reversal of the relapsed mood symptoms when the isotretinoin was discontinued, whether prematurely or after a full course Limitations The limitations of this study include small sample size, retrospective data collection, absence of double-blind controlled design, and inability to control for spontaneous mood episodes in patients with BD Conclusions These results indicate that BD patients treated with isotretinoin for acne are at risk for clinically significant exacerbation of mood symptoms, including suicidal ideation, even with concurrent use of psychiatric medicines for BD The clinical implications of this study are especially relevant to the treatment of patients with BD because acne usually occurs during adolescence, which is often the age of onset of BD and because a common side effect of lithium (a standard treatment for BD) is acne (C) 2009 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据