4.7 Review

Is acupuncture beneficial in depression: A meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials?

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 111, 期 2-3, 页码 125-134

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.04.020

关键词

Depression; Acupuncture; Meta-analysis; Randomized clinical trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Depression is one of the most common mental health disorders. Acupuncture is a Popular complementary and alternative medicine intervention suggested in the treatment of depression, but its effectiveness is uncertain. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to more precisely assess the beneficial effect of acupuncture ill depression therapy. Methods: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database. The following terms were used: acupuncture, acupressure. depression, depressive disorder. clinical trial, and randomized controlled trial. Results: Eight small-randomized controlled trials comparing 477 Subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Our results confirmed that acupuncture Could significantly reduce the severity of depression, which was indicated by decreased scores of Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD) or Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The pooled standardized mean difference of the 'Improvement of depression' was -0.65 (95% CI -1.18, -0.11 P=0.02) by random effect model. However. no significant effect of active acupuncture was found oil the response rate (RR 1.32. 95%, CI 0.83 to 2.10: P=0.25) and remission rate (RR 1.30, 95%, CI 0.57 to 2.95; P = 0.53). Conclusion Although this meta-analysis might be discounted due to the low quality of individual trials, it supported that acupuncture was an effective treatment that Could significantly reduce the severity of disease in the patients with depression. More full-scale randomized clinical trials with reliable designs are recommended to further warrant the effectiveness of acupuncture. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据