4.7 Article

Impact of maternal psychological distress on fetal weight, prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 111, 期 2-3, 页码 214-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.017

关键词

Pregnancy; Maternal psychological distress; Low birth weight; Preterm birth; Intrauterine growth retardation; Maternal psychiatric disorders

资金

  1. Regione Piemonte, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There are conflicting results regarding the association of maternal antenatal distress with pretei nd I rt i weight. This study investigated the association between maternal distress and intrauterine growth abnormality. low birth weight and preterm birth. Methods: Three mutually exclusive and homogeneous groups of pregnant women (with actual psychiatric disorder, with maternal psychological distress, and healthy comparisons) underwent fetal ultrasound examinations, Uterine and Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. Infant weight was measured and information collected oil obstetrical features and sociodemographic factors. Results. No differences emerged among, the three groups of pregnant women in any ultrasound variables. Antenatal maternal psychiatric disorders and antenatal distress were not associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, Infants of women with psychiatric disorders had lower birth weight and higher percentage of birth weight below the 10th centile for gestational age (30%) than infants of healthy mothers (5%). Limitations: These findings are preliminary and warrant further investigation in larger-scale study; they are limited by the heterogeneity of psychiatric diagnoses.,lit, but the effect is unlikely to be due to Conclusions: Maternal psychiatric disorders are associated with a lower birth weight, abnormal utero-placental or feto-placental vascularisation. Further studies should investigate other possible causes of lower birth weight associated with maternal psychiatric disorders. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据