4.6 Article

Fast Monte Carlo simulation for particle coagulation in population balance

期刊

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 11-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.03.006

关键词

Population balance modeling; Particle coagulation; Stochastic simulation; Differentially weighting scheme; Particle size distribution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276077, 51390494]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-09-0395]
  3. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems [MPCS-2011-D-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Monte Carlo (MC) method for population balance modeling (PBM) has become increasingly popular because the discrete and stochastic nature of the MC method is especially suited for particle dynamics. However, for the two-particle events (typically, particle coagulation), the double looping over all simulation particles is required in normal MC methods, and the computational cost is O(N-s(2)), where N-s is the simulation particle number. This paper proposes a fast random simulation scheme based on the differentially-weighted Monte Carlo (DWMC) method. The majorant of coagulation kernel was introduced to estimate the maximum coagulation rate by a single looping over all particles rather than the double looping. The acceptance-rejection process then proceeded to select successful coagulation particle pairs randomly, and meanwhile the waiting time (time-step) for a coagulation event was estimated by summing the coagulation kernels of rejected and accepted particle pairs. In such a way, the double looping is avoided and computational efficiency is greatly improved as expected. Five coagulation cases for which analytical solutions or benchmark solutions exist were simulated by the fast and normal DWMC, respectively. It is found the CPU time required is orders of magnitude lower and only increases linearly with N-s; at the same time the computational accuracy is guaranteed very favorably. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据