4.6 Article

Nursing intellectual capital theory: operationalization and empirical validation of concepts

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
卷 69, 期 8, 页码 1785-1796

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12040

关键词

continuing education; exploratory factor analysis; human capital; nurse staffing; nursing theory

类别

资金

  1. Nursing Health Services Research Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsTo present the operationalization of concepts in the nursing intellectual capital theory and the results of a methodological study aimed at empirically validating the concepts. BackgroundThe nursing intellectual capital theory proposes that the stocks of nursing knowledge in an organization are embedded in two concepts, nursing human capital and nursing structural capital. The theory also proposes that two concepts in the work environment, nurse staffing and employer support for nursing continuing professional development, influence nursing human capital. DesignA cross-sectional design. MethodsA systematic three-step process was used to operationalize the concepts of the theory. In 2008, data were collected for 147 inpatient units from administrative departments and unit managers in 6 Canadian hospitals. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to determine if the indicator variables accurately reflect their respective concepts. ResultsThe proposed indicator variables collectively measured the nurse staffing concept. Three indicators were retained to construct nursing human capital: clinical expertise and experience concept. The nursing structural capital and employer support for nursing continuing professional development concepts were not validated empirically. ConclusionThe nurse staffing and the nursing human capital: clinical expertise and experience concepts will be brought forward for further model testing. Refinement for some of the indicator variables of the concepts is indicated. Additional research is required with different sources of data to confirm the findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据