4.1 Article

Nano-silymarin provides protection against γ-radiation-induced oxidative stress in cultured human embryonic kidney cells

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.08.006

关键词

Nano-silymarin; gamma-Irradiation; HEK cells; Reactive oxygen species; Flow cytometry

资金

  1. DRDO
  2. General-Life Sciences, Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Government of India
  3. Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radiation can produce biological damage, mainly oxidative stress, via production of free radicals, including reactive oxygen species (ROS). Nanoparticles are of interest as radioprotective agents, particularly due to their high solubility and bioavailability. Silymarin is a hepatoprotective agent but has poor oral bioavailability. Silymarin was formulated as a nanoemulsion with the aim of improving its bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. In the present study, we evaluated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems (SNEDDS) formulated with surfactants and co-surfactants. Nano-silymarin was characterized by estimating % transmittance, globule size, and polydispersity index, and by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The nano-silymarin obtained was in the range of 3-8 nm diameter. With regard to DNA damage, measured by a plasmid relaxation assay, maximum protection was obtained at 10 mu g/mL. Cytotoxicity of nano-silymarin to human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells was evaluated using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MU) assay. Protective efficacy against gamma-radiation was assessed by reduction in micronucleus frequency and ROS generation, using the 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H(2)DCFDA) assay. Radiation-induced apoptosis was estimated by microscopic analysis and cell-cycle estimation. Nano-silymarin was radioprotective, supporting the possibility of developing new approaches to radiation protection via nanotechnology. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据