4.6 Review

Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 1171-1181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04998.x

关键词

case study; integrative review; methodology; nursing; qualitative research

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health, Reproduction
  3. Child Health New Investigator Personnel Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review. This paper is a report of an integrative review conducted to critically analyse the contemporary use of qualitative case study methodology in nursing research. Increasing complexity in health care and increasing use of case study in nursing research support the need for current examination of this methodology. In 2007, a search for case study research (published 2005-2007) indexed in the CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts and SCOPUS databases was conducted. A sample of 42 case study research papers met the inclusion criteria. Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method guided the analysis. Confusion exists about the name, nature and use of case study. This methodology, including terminology and concepts, is often invisible in qualitative study titles and abstracts. Case study is an exclusive methodology and an adjunct to exploring particular aspects of phenomena under investigation in larger or mixed-methods studies. A high quality of case study exists in nursing research. Judicious selection and diligent application of literature review methods promote the development of nursing science. Case study is becoming entrenched in the nursing research lexicon as a well-accepted methodology for studying phenomena in health and social care, and its growing use warrants continued appraisal to promote nursing knowledge development. Attention to all case study elements, process and publication is important in promoting authenticity, methodological quality and visibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据