4.6 Article

Is Depression Contagious? A Test of Alternative Peer Socialization Mechanisms of Depressive Symptoms in Adolescent Peer Networks

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 250-255

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.013

关键词

Adolescence; Peer networks; Depressive symptoms; Peer selection; Peer socialization; Peer contagion

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [134931, 139168, 213486]
  2. Jacobs Foundation
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [134931, 139168, 139168, 134931] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study examined the role of two different types of peer socialization (convergence, contagion) in adolescents' depression, adjusting for the effects of peer selection and deselection. Methods: The sample used in this study comprised 949 Finnish adolescents (56% females; mean age: 16 years at the outset) attending classrooms in eight secondary schools. Participants identified three school peers and reported depressive symptoms twice, 1 year apart. Sociometric and behavioral data were analyzed using dynamic social network analysis. Results: Adolescents initiated relationships with peers who reported similar levels of depression before initiation of the relationship, and dissolved relationships with peers who became dissimilar in depression from time 1 (T1) to time 2 (T2). The average score of peers' depressive symptoms at T1 predicted changes in adolescent depression at T2 (convergence), but adolescents with peers who reported relatively higher initial levels of depression did not report an increase in depression (contagion). Conclusions: Over time, adolescents' depressive symptoms increasingly converged toward the average levels of their peers, but this convergence was not primarily because of contagion effects. The findings suggest that socialization processes can lead to both increases and decreases in adolescent depression, depending on peers' average level of depression. (C) 2012 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据