3.9 Article

CHITINASE PRODUCTION BY BACILLUS SUBTILIS ATCC 11774 AND ITS EFFECT ON BIOCONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA DISEASES OF POTATO

期刊

ACTA BIOLOGICA HUNGARICA
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 436-448

出版社

AKADEMIAI KIADO ZRT
DOI: 10.1556/018.66.2015.4.8

关键词

Antagonism; antifungal; biological control; black scurf; stem canker disease

类别

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RGP-VPP-327]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem canker and black scurf of potato, caused by Rhizoctonia solani, can be serious diseases causing an economically significant damage. Biocontrol activity of Bacillus subtilis ATCC 11774 against the Rhizoctonia diseases of potato was investigated in this study. Chitinase enzyme was optimally produced by B. subtilis under batch fermentation conditions similar to those of the potato-growing soil. The maximum chitinase was obtained at initial pH 8 and 30 degrees C. In vitro, the lytic action of the B. subtilis chitinase was detected releasing 355 mu g GlcNAc ml(-1) from the cell wall extract of R. solani and suggesting the presence of various chitinase enzymes in the bacterial filtrate. In dual culture test, the antagonistic behavior of B. subtilis resulted in the inhibition of the radial growth of R. solani by 48.1% after 4 days. Moreover, the extracted B. subtilis chitinase reduced the growth of R. solani by 42.3% when incorporated with the PDA plates. Under greenhouse conditions, application of a bacterial suspension of B. subtilis at 109 cell mL(-1) significantly reduced the disease incidence of stem canker and black scurf to 22.3 and 30%, respectively. In addition, it significantly improved some biochemical parameters, growth and tubers yield. Our findings indicate two points; firstly, B. subtilis possesses a good biocontrol activity against Rhizoctonia diseases of potato, secondly, the harmonization and suitability of the soil conditions to the growth and activity of B. subtilis guaranteed a high controlling capacity against the target pathogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据