4.4 Article

Impact of the Charge-Regulated Nature of the Bacterial Cell Surface on the Activity of Adhered Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 25, 期 17, 页码 2199-2218

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1163/016942411X574916

关键词

ATP; proton motive force; adhesion; charge regulation; biofilm

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0134362, 0828356]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0134362, 0828356] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the first reported observations by Zobell in 1943, it has been recognized that the metabolic activity of adhered bacteria can differ from that of their planktonic counterparts. Many studies have been performed and the overwhelming evidence is that bacterial adhesion to surfaces can result in changes to cellular metabolic activity and that the changes are a function of the surface properties of both the bacterial and adhering surfaces. However, the mechanism that results in these observations has remained elusive. The authors have approached this problem by focusing on cellular bioenergetics, which describes how bacteria obtain, store and use energy, and how adhesion can affect this process. In a series of experimental and numerical studies, the authors developed a hypothesis linking cellular bioenergetics to the physicochemical charge-regulation effect, which causes variations in surface electrostatic properties as a surface containing acid/base functional groups (e.g., the bacterial cell surface) approaches another surface. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize these prior studies and provide a cohesive presentation of the hypothesis. If this hypothesis is ultimately shown to be true, it will provide a fundamental basis for the engineered design of surface materials and coatings that can enhance or inhibit bacterial activity and colonization, depending on the requirements of the system at hand. (C) Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据