4.1 Article

Computer-assisted image analysis of temporal retinal vessel width and tortuosity in retinopathy of prematurity for the assessment of disease severity and treatment outcome

期刊

JOURNAL OF AAPOS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 374-380

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE To quantify the severity of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) through temporal retinal vessel diameter and tortuosity by the use semiautomated analysis and to evaluate the effects of laser treatment on retinal vessel measurements. METHODS A total of 176 RetCam digital fundus images from 63 infants diagnosed with ROP between January 2005 and December 2008 were retrospectively analyzed with Retinal Vessel Measurement V5.8 software. Patients were classified into 1 of 3 groups: stage 1 and 2 (Group 1), stage 3 not requiring treatment (Group 2), and stage 3 requiring treatment (Group 3). Diameter and tortuosity of the 4 major temporal retinal arteries and veins close to the optic disk were quantified. Tortuosity was measured as central (within 2 disk diameters from the center of the optic disk) and paracentral (from 2 to 4 disk diameters). For Group 3, measurements of vessels immediately before treatment and all follow-up post-treatment measurements of vessels were analyzed. RESULTS Differences in central and paracentral arteriolar tortuosity were pronounced. The average central arteriolar tortuosities were 1.12 +/- 0.018 for Group 1, 1.13 +/- 0.018 for Group 2, and 1.32 +/- for Group 3; the paracentral arteriolar tortuosities were 1.11 +/- 0.019 for Group 1, 1.12 +/- 0.019 for Group 2, and 1.31 +/- 0.02 for Group 3. In the post-treatment analysis of Group 3 patients, significant reductions in all vascular measurements were observed compared to pre-treatment, except for central and paracentral vein tortuosity. CONCLUSIONS Computerized systems can be used to objectively assess differences in vascular parameters between ROP stages. (J AAPOS 2011;15:374-380)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据