4.3 Article

Chitinase 3-like proteins as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 1251-1261

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458514561906

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; biomarkers; proteomics; cerebrospinal fluid; diagnosis; prognosis

资金

  1. Fondation pour l'Aide a la Recherche sur la Sclerose en Plaques (ARSEP Foundation, AO)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  4. la Region Languedoc Roussillon
  5. Club Francophone de la Sclerose en Plaques

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite sensitivity of MRI to diagnose multiple sclerosis (MS), prognostic biomarkers are still needed for optimized treatment. Objective: The objective of this paper is to identify cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diagnostic biomarkers of MS using quantitative proteomics and to analyze their expression at different disease stages. Methods: We conducted differential analysis of the CSF proteome from control and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients followed by verification by ELISA of candidate biomarkers in CSF and serum in control, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), RRMS and progressive MS (PMS) patients. Results: Twenty-two of the 527 quantified proteins exhibited different abundances in control and RRMS CSF. These include chitinase 3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1) and 2 (CHI3L2), which showed a strong expression in brain of MS patients, especially in astrocytes and microglial cells from white matter plaques. CSF and serum CHI3L1 levels increased with the disease stage and CIS patients with high CSF (>189 ng/ml) and serum (>33 ng/ml) CHI3L1 converted more rapidly to RRMS (log rank test, p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). In contrast, CSF CHI3L2 levels were lower in PMS than in RRMS patients. Accordingly, CSF CHI3L1/CHI3L2 ratio accurately discriminated PMS from RRMS. Conclusions: CSF CHI3L1 and CHI3L2 and serum CHI3L1 might help to define MS disease stage and have a prognostic value in CIS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据