4.3 Article

Optical coherence tomography indicates disease activity prior to clinical onset of central nervous system demyelination

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 893-900

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458515604496

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; optical coherence tomography; radiologically isolated syndrome; inner nuclear layer; disease progression; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [TR 128, SFB 1054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Establishing biomarkers for predicting disease activity in demyelinating disease of the central nervous system is crucial for designing appropriate disease modifiying treatment strategies. Objective: To investigate retinal findings and disease activity in patients with radiologically isolated and clinically isolated syndromes. Methods: We performed retinal optical coherence tomography and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging in healthy control individuals (n=19), in individuals with non-specific white matter lesions (n=18), and in patients with clinically isolated syndromes (n=18) and radiologically isolated syndromes (n=20). Results: Reduced volume of retinal nerve fibre layer and increased volume of inner nuclear layer at baseline correlated with subsequent disease activity as measured by an increase in cerebral T2 lesion load in patients with radiologically isolated syndromes. Reduced volume of retinal nerve fibre layer and increased volumes of inner and outer nuclear layer were associated with progression into multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Conclusion: Patients with radiologically and clinically isolated syndromes behave similarly concerning paraclinical disease activity in cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. In both conditions, reduction of retinal nerve fibre layer and increased inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer volumes predict disease activity and are associated with progression into multiple sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据