4.6 Article

Assessing DNA methylation in the developing human intestinal epithelium: potential link to inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 647-658

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2015.88

关键词

-

资金

  1. Evelyn Trust
  2. Crohn's in Childhood Research Association (CICRA)
  3. Crohn's and Colitis in Childhood (3Cs) charity
  4. CICRA
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [CA226/4-3]
  6. Interne Forschungsforderung Essen (IFORES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA methylation is one of the major epigenetic mechanisms implicated in regulating cellular development and cell-type-specific gene expression. Here we performed simultaneous genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression analysis on purified intestinal epithelial cells derived from human fetal gut, healthy pediatric biopsies, and children newly diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Results were validated using pyrosequencing, real-time PCR, and immunostaining. The functional impact of DNA methylation changes on gene expression was assessed by employing in-vitro assays in intestinal cell lines. DNA methylation analyses allowed identification of 214 genes for which expression is regulated via DNA methylation, i.e. regulatory differentially methylated regions (rDMRs). Pathway and functional analysis of rDMRs suggested a critical role for DNA methylation in regulating gene expression and functional development of the human intestinal epithelium. Moreover, analysis performed on intestinal epithelium of children newly diagnosed with IBD revealed alterations in DNA methylation within genomic loci, which were found to overlap significantly with those undergoing methylation changes during intestinal development. Our study provides novel insights into the physiological role of DNA methylation in regulating functional maturation of the human intestinal epithelium. Moreover, we provide data linking developmentally acquired alterations in the DNA methylation profile to changes seen in pediatric IBD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据