4.3 Article

Compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anemia: a prospective study

期刊

JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 316-322

出版社

SOC BRASIL PEDIATRIA
DOI: 10.2223/JPED.1819

关键词

sickle cell anemia; antibiotic prophylaxis; treatment refusal; guideline adherence; penicillin V

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To prospectively assess compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis among children with sickle cell anemia. Methods: A total of 108 children (aged 3 months to 4 1/2 years, 45% male) were recruited from the Hematology Centerin Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and followed up for 15 months. Data on compliance were obtained from three interviews with the primary caregivers, from the children's medical records and from assay of antibacterial activity in urine samples of 81 children. Antibiotics were available free of charge. Results: Penicillin was used in 106 cases (majority by oral route); erythromycin in 2 cases. Urine samples tested positive for the antibiotic in 56% of the cases; 48% of the caregivers assured during interviews that all doses had been administered to children; 89% of medical files recorded no compliance failures. Considering a child compliant if none or just one of these methods detected missing doses, the rate of compliance was 67%. The agreement between methods for assigning a child as compliant or not was low. No significant association of compliance rate with gender, nutritional status, per capita income of the family, caregivers' schooling, or number of family members was demonstrated. Conclusions: Compliance rate with prophylactic antibiotic therapy was low when assessed by interviews and urine tests and overestimated by analysis of medical records. Compliance should preferably be assessed by several methods due to the complex character of its measurement. The results of the present study suggest the need fora comprehensive educational program involving healthcare professionals, families and children with sickle cell anemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据