4.1 Article

Niveis de atividade fisica e preditores de mortalidade na DPOC

期刊

JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 659-666

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA PNEUMOLOGIA TISIOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-37132013000600004

关键词

Pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive/mortality; Pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive/prevention and control; Motor activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare the Body mass index, airway Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise capacity (BODE) index scores and its individual components between COPD patients with and without severe physical inactivity, as well as to correlate the number of steps/day with scores of physical activity questionnaires, age, and the BODE index (including its components). Methods: We included 30 patients, who were evaluated for body composition, pulmonary function (1-EVI), perception of dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council scale), and exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance (6MVVD]). The patients also completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (iPAQ), short version, and the modified Baecke questionnaire (mBQ). The level of physical activity was assessed by the number of steps/day (as determined by pedometer), using the cut-off of 4,580 steps/day to form two groups: no severe physical inactivity (SP1-) and severe physical inactivity (SP1+). We used the Mann-Whitney test or t-test, as well as Pearson's or Spearman's correlation tests, in the statistical analysis. Results: in comparison with the SP1- group, the SP1+ group showed more advanced age, higher mBQ scores (leisure domain), lower 6MWD (in m and % of predicted), and lower 1PAQ scores (metabolic equivalent-walk/week domain and total). The 1PAQ scores showed weak correlations with steps/day (r = 0.399), age (r = -0.459), and 6MWD-in m (r = 0.446) and in % of predicted (r = 0.422). Conclusions: in our sample, the cut-off of 4,580 steps/day was not sensitive enough to identify differences between the groups when compared with the predictors of mortality. The 1PAQ, short version score correlated with steps/day.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据