4.4 Review

Efficacy of anakinra in calcium pyrophosphate crystal-induced arthritis: A report of 16 cases and review of the literature

期刊

JOINT BONE SPINE
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 178-182

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.07.018

关键词

Calcium pyrophosphate crystal; IL-1b; Anakinra; Arthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystal-induced arthritis occurs particularly in elderly people. This population has frequently associated comorbidities and treatments, which could limit the use of conventional therapies (colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids). The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of anakinra in patients with CPP crystal-induced arthritis. Methods: We performed a multicentric retrospective chart review of patients who received anakinra for CPP crystal-induced arthritis. Demographic information, comorbidities, co-prescription, short-term treatment outcomes, adverse event, complication and subsequent flares were reviewed. Results: A total of 16 patients (12 females, mean age: 80.2 +/- 11.1 years) received anakinra (100 mg subcutaneously per day). The mean number of anakinra injection was 15.5 +/- 42.9 per patient (median: 3). All patients had contraindication and/or failure to conventional therapies. The majority (14 [87.5%]) of patients with CPP crystal-induced arthritis demonstrated a beneficial response to anakinra therapy: 10 good responses and four partial responses. A relapse occurred in six (37.5%) patients (mean time to relapse: 3.4 +/- 4.9 months). One patient had an acute bacterial pneumonitis. Conclusion: Our results suggest that anakinra is relatively well tolerated and could be a good option in the treatment of CPP crystal-induced arthritis, illustrating that IL-1 beta blockade may be helpful to control flares in patients having CPP crystal-induced arthritis for which conventional therapies are ineffective or contra-indicated. (C) 2012 Societe francaise de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据