4.7 Article

The energy and momentum input of supernova explosions in structured and ionized molecular clouds

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1155

关键词

methods: numerical; ISM: bubbles; H II regions; ISM: structure; ISM: supernova remnants

资金

  1. DFG [1573]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the early impact of single and binary supernova (SN) explosions on dense gas clouds with three-dimensional, high-resolution, hydrodynamic simulations. The effect of cloud structure, radiative cooling and ionizing radiation from the progenitor stars on the net input of kinetic energy, f(kin) = E-kin/E-SN, thermal energy, f(therm) = E-therm/E-SN, and gas momentum, f(P) = P/P-SN, to the interstellar medium (ISM) is tested. For clouds with (n) over bar = 100 cm(-3), the momentum generating Sedov and pressure-driven snowplough phases are terminated early (proportional to 0.01 Myr) and radiative cooling limits the coupling to f(therm) similar to 0.01, f(kin) similar to 0.05, and f(P) similar to 9, significantly lower than for the case without cooling. For pre-ionized clouds, these numbers are only increased by similar to 50 per cent, independent of the cloud structure. This only suffices to accelerate similar to 5 per cent of the cloud to radial velocities greater than or similar to 30 km s(-1). A second SN might enhance the coupling efficiencies if delayed past the Sedov phase of the first explosion. Such very low coupling efficiencies cast doubts on many subresolution models for SN feedback, which are, in general, validated a posteriori. Ionizing radiation appears not to significantly enhance the coupling of SNe to the surrounding gas as it drives the ISM into inert dense shells and cold clumps, a process which is unresolved in galaxy-scale simulations. Our results indicate that the momentum input of SNe in ionized, structured clouds is larger (more than a factor of 10) than the corresponding momentum yield of the progenitor's stellar winds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据