4.7 Article

Limb darkening and exoplanets: testing stellar model atmospheres and identifying biases in transit parameters

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv744

关键词

stars: atmospheres

资金

  1. CONICYT-PCHA/Doctorado Nacional
  2. Ministry for the Economy, Development, and Tourism's Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio [IC 120009]
  3. FONDECYT [1130857]
  4. BASAL CATA [PFB-06]
  5. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  6. NASA Office of Space Science [NNX13AC07G]
  7. NASA Science Mission directorate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Limb darkening is fundamental in determining transit light-curve shapes, and is typically modelled by a variety of laws that parametrize the intensity profile of the star that is being transited. Confronted with a transit light curve, some authors fix the parameters of these laws, the so-called limb darkening coefficients (LDCs), while others prefer to let them float in the light-curve fitting procedure. Which of these is the best strategy, however, is still unclear, as well as how and by how much each of these can bias the retrieved transit parameters. In this work we attempt to clarify those points by first recalculating these LDCs, comparing them to measured values from Kepler transit light curves using an algorithm that takes into account uncertainties in both the geometry of the transit and the parameters of the stellar host. We show there are significant departures from predicted model values, suggesting that our understanding of limb darkening still needs to improve. Then, we show through simulations that if one uses the quadratic limb darkening law to parametrize limb darkening, fixing and fitting the LDCs can lead to significant biases - up to similar to 3 and similar to 1 per cent in R-p/R-*, respectively - which are important for several confirmed and candidate exoplanets. We conclude that, in this case, the best approach is to let the LDCs be free in the fitting procedure. Strategies to avoid biases in data from present and future missions involving high precision measurements of transit parameters are described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据