4.2 Article

A 3-Day Delay in Synovial Fluid Crystal Identification Did Not Hinder the Reliable Detection of Monosodium Urate and Calcium Pyrophosphate Crystals

期刊

JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 241-245

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31829cde53

关键词

gout; arthritis; synovial fluid; crystals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Arthrocentesis is an essential emergency step in managing patients with acute arthritis. To identify a bacterial infection, Gram staining is performed promptly. However, crystal analysis may not be immediately performed in many facilities. Being considered not to be stable over time, synovial fluid (SF) is sometimes discarded instead of being stored for crystal identification. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the detectability of monosodium urate (MSU) and calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals in SF over a period of 3 days. Methods: Consecutive SF samples from 75 joints were analyzed for MSU, CPP crystals, and pH. Two independent observers evaluated the samples by regular light and polarization microscopy immediately after arthrocentesis and after 1, 2, and 3 days at room temperature or at 4 degrees C. Results: Of 75 samples, 27 contained crystals (16 MSU, 6 CPP, 5 both); semiquantitative counts of both MSU and CPP crystals did not change significantly after 3 days. There was no new formation of crystals in any of the crystal-negative samples, which was independent of the storage temperature. Synovial fluid pH was not predictive of crystals and did not change over time. Conclusions: Although immediate workup for microbiology, including Gram stain and culture, is indispensable and well established, crystal analysis may at times not be immediately performed. Our study suggests that when crystal identification cannot be done immediately, it can be safely performed up to 3 days after arthrocentesis when SF is stored at 4 degrees C or even at stable room temperature (20 degrees C).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据