4.7 Article

Benchmarking the power of amateur observatories for TTV exoplanets detection

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv788

关键词

methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; techniques: photometric; techniques: radial velocities; surveys; planetary systems

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [14-02-92615 KO_a]
  2. UK Royal Society International Exchange grant [IE140055]
  3. Presidium of Russian Academy of Sciences [P21, P22]
  4. Saint Petersburg State University [6.37.341.2015]
  5. Russian Ministry of Education and Science [01201465056]
  6. Ankara University (BAP) [13B4240006]
  7. [MK-733.2014.2]
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M001008/1, ST/L001403/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/M001008/1, ST/L001403/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We perform an analysis of similar to 80 000 photometric measurements for the following 10 stars hosting transiting planets: WASP-2, -4, -5, -52, Kelt-1, CoRoT-2, XO-2, TrES-1, HD 189733, GJ 436. Our analysis includes mainly transit light curves from the Exoplanet Transit Database, public photometry from the literature, and some proprietary photometry privately supplied by other authors. Half of these light curves were obtained by amateurs. From this photometry we derive 306 transit timing measurements, as well as improved planetary transit parameters. Additionally, for 6 of these 10 stars we present a set of radial velocity measurements obtained from the spectra stored in the HARPS, HARPS-N and SOPHIE archives using the HARPS-TERRA pipeline. Our analysis of these transit timing and radial velocity data did not reveal significant hints of additional orbiting bodies in almost all of the cases. In the WASP-4 case, we found hints of marginally significant TTV signals having amplitude 10-20 s, although their parameters are model dependent and uncertain, while radial velocities did not reveal statistically significant Doppler signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据