4.4 Article

Incidence of and risk factors for seizures after myelography performed with iohexol in dogs: 503 cases (2002-2004)

出版社

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/javma.238.10.1296

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To establish the incidence of and risk factors for seizures following myelography performed with iohexol in dogs. Design-Retrospective case series. Animals-503 dogs. Procedures-Medical records were searched for dogs that underwent myelography between April 2002 and December 2004. Data extracted included body weight, breed, age, sex, volume and dose of iohexol, site of injections, location of lesion, duration of anesthesia, surgical procedures immediately after myelography, use of acepromazine, and presence or absence of seizures. Results-15 (3%) dogs had postmyelographic seizures. Risk factors significantly associated with seizures were size of dogs (large dogs were 35.35 times as likely to have seizures as were small dogs), location of contrast medium injection (dogs in which iohexol was injected into the cerebellomedullary cistern were 74 times as likely to have seizures as were dogs in which iohexol was injected into the lumbar cistern), location of lesion (dogs with lesions at the level of the cervical portion of the vertebral column were 4.65 times as likely to develop seizures as were dogs with lesions in other regions), and total volume of iohexol. Mean +/- SD total volume of iohexol was 11.73 +/- 5.52 mL (median, 10.5 mL [range, 3.0 to 21.0 mL]) for dogs that had seizures and 4.57 +/- 4.13 mL (median, 3.5 mL [range, 0.75 to 45.0 mL]) for those that did not. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Large-breed dogs with cervical lesions and large volumes of iohexol injected into the cerebellomedullary cistern had the highest risk of seizures. The use of contrast medium volumes > 8 mL in large dogs should be avoided, with preference given to injections into the lumbar cistern. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011;238:1296-1300)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据