4.3 Article

Transplantation of mouse embryonic stem cells into the cochlea of an auditory-neuropathy animal model: Effects of timing after injury

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0119-x

关键词

embryonic stem cells; spiral ganglion neurons; hearing loss; inner ear; Rosenthal's canal; injured microenvironment; neovascularization

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [C06 RR014516] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG014748, AG14748] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC000713, P50 DC000422, DC00713, R03 DC007506, DC07506] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS045810, R01 NS045155, NS45155, NS45810] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Application of ouabain to the round window membrane of the gerbil selectively induces the death of most spiral ganglion neurons and thus provides an excellent model for investigating the survival and differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) introduced into the inner ear. In this study, mouse ESCs were pretreated with a neural- induction protocol and transplanted into Rosenthal's canal ( RC), perilymph, or endolymph of Mongolian gerbils either 1-3 days ( early post-injury transplant group) or 7 days or longer ( late post-injury transplant group) after ouabain injury. Overall, ESC survival in RC and perilymphatic spaces was significantly greater in the early post-injury microenvironment as compared to the later post-injury condition. Viable clusters of ESCs within RC and perilymphatic spaces appeared to be associated with neovascularization in the early post-injury group. A small number of ESCs transplanted within RC stained for mature neuronal or glial cell markers. ESCs introduced into perilymph survived in several locations, but most differentiated into glia-like cells. ESCs transplanted into endolymph survived poorly if at all. These experiments demonstrate that there is an optimal time window for engraftment and survival of ESCs that occurs in the early post-injury period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据