4.7 Article

The GALAH survey: scientific motivation

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv327

关键词

Galaxy: stellar content

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP1095368, DP120101815, DP120101237, DP120104562, FS110200035, FL110100012]
  2. ARC Future Fellowship [FT120100363]
  3. ARC [FL110100012]
  4. ARC DECRA [DE140100598]
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. Australian Research Council [FS110200035] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Physics [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Galactic Archaeology with HERMES (GALAH) survey is a large high-resolution spectroscopic survey using the newly commissioned High Efficiency and Resolution Multi-Element Spectrograph (HERMES) on the Anglo-Australian Telescope. The HERMES spectrograph provides high-resolution (R similar to 28 000) spectra in four passbands for 392 stars simultaneously over a 2 deg field of view. The goal of the survey is to unravel the formation and evolutionary history of the Milky Way, using fossil remnants of ancient star formation events which have been disrupted and are now dispersed throughout the Galaxy. Chemical tagging seeks to identify such dispersed remnants solely from their common and unique chemical signatures; these groups are unidentifiable from their spatial, photometric or kinematic properties. To carry out chemical tagging, the GALAH survey will acquire spectra for a million stars down to V similar to 14. The HERMES spectra of FGK stars contain absorption lines from 29 elements including light proton-capture elements, alpha-elements, odd-Z elements, iron-peak elements and n-capture elements from the light and heavy s-process and the r-process. This paper describes the motivation and planned execution of the GALAH survey, and presents some results on the first-light performance of HERMES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据