4.2 Review

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Historical Overview of Clinical Studies

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 345-350

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyt014

关键词

stereotactic radiotherapy; non-small-cell lung cancer; Stage I; clinical study; review

类别

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [20S-5, 20S-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of difficulties with stabilization, breathing motion and dosimetry, stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer has only been practiced for the past 15 years. However, a large amount of case data has rapidly been accumulated in recent years. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer has been actively investigated in inoperable patients since around 1995, and a number of clinical trials have been undertaken. Early studies from 2001 presented a 3-year local control rate of 94 and a 3-year overall survival rate of 66 for patients receiving 5060 Gy in 10 fractions. Another study in 2005, using 48 Gy in four fractions, presented a 3-year local control rate of 98 and 3-year overall survival rates of 83 for Stage IA patients and 72 for Stage IB patients. A multi-institutional study showed favorable local control and survival rates in a group receiving a biologically effective dose of 100 Gy. A dose-escalation study in the USA suggested a maximum tolerated dose of 60 Gy in three fractions. A Phase II clinical trial (RTOG0236) followed, with a reported 3-year local control rate of 98 and a 3-year overall survival rate of 56 for patients who received 60 Gy in three fractions. A Japanese Phase II clinical trial (JCOG0403) investigated a dose of 48 Gy in four fractions among 165 Stage IA patients, showing a 3-year survival rate of 76 and a 3-year locally progression-free survival rate of 69 for the operable group. An overview of past clinical trials in stereotactic body radiotherapy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer and current issues is presented and discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据