4.7 Article

Prospects for gravitational-wave detection and supermassive black hole astrophysics with pulsar timing arrays

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2659

关键词

black hole physics; gravitational waves; pulsars: general; galaxies: evolution

资金

  1. John Stocker Postgraduate Scholarship from the Science and Industry Endowment Fund
  2. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-area sky surveys show that massive galaxies undergo at least one major merger in a Hubble time. Ongoing pulsar timing array (PTA) experiments are aimed at measuring the gravitational-wave (GW) emission from binary supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at the centres of galaxy merger remnants. In this paper, using the latest observational estimates for a range of galaxy properties and scaling relations, we predict the amplitude of the GW background generated by the binary SMBH population. We also predict the numbers of individual binary SMBH GW sources. We predict the characteristic strain amplitude of the GW background to lie in the range 5.1 x 10(-16) < A(yr) < 2.4 x 10(-15) at a frequency of (1 yr)(-1), with 95 per cent confidence. Higher values within this range, which correspond to the more commonly preferred choice of galaxy merger time-scale, will fall within the expected sensitivity ranges of existing PTA projects in the next few years. In contrast, we find that a PTA consisting of at least 100 pulsars observed with next-generation radio telescopes will be required to detect continuous-wave GWs from binary SMBHs. We further suggest that GW memory bursts from coalescing SMBH pairs are not viable sources for PTAs. Both the GW background and individual GW source counts are dominated by binaries formed in mergers between early-type galaxies of masses greater than or similar to 5 x 10(10)M(circle dot) at redshifts less than or similar to 1.5. Uncertainties in the galaxy merger time-scale and the SMBH mass-galaxy bulge mass relation dominate the uncertainty in our predictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据