4.7 Article

Galaxy counterparts of metal-rich damped Ly alpha absorbers: the case of J205922.4-052842

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2578

关键词

galaxies: abundances; galaxies: ISM; quasars: absorption lines; quasars: individual: J205922.4-052842; quasars: individual: J105744.5+062914; quasars: individual: J003034.4-512946

资金

  1. Dutch Research School for Astronomy (NOVA)
  2. ERC-StG [EGGS-278202]
  3. DNRF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present observations of three new sources in the European Southern Observatory VLT/X-shooter survey dedicated to the detection of the emitting counterparts of damped Ly alpha (DLA) systems towards bright quasars (QSOs). The aim is to bridge the observational gap between absorption (i.e. DLAs) and emission-selected galaxies at z similar to 2.2-2.5, in order to get a more complete picture of (proto)galaxies around this epoch. The hypothesis is that because DLA galaxies fulfil metallicity-velocity width and luminosity-metallicity relations, high-metallicity DLAs are more likely to be detected in emission. The region around each QSO is covered with slits (1.3 arcsec x 11 arcsec) at three different position angles. In the DLA towards QSO J205922.4-052842 (z(DLA) = 2.210, [S/H] = -0.91 +/- 0.06), Ly alpha emission is detected at 3 sigma confidence limit at an impact parameter of <6.3 kpc, and indicates a star formation rate >0.40M(circle dot) yr(-1) for the associated DLA galaxy. We do not detect the associated emission of two other DLAs in the spectra of QSOs J003034.4-512946 (z(DLA) = 2.452, [Zn/H] = -1.48 +/- 0.34) and J105744.5+062914 (z(DLA) = 2.499, [Zn/H] = -0.24 +/- 0.11, [S/H] = -0.15 +/- 0.06). We conclude that focusing on metal-rich DLAs is a good way to find counterparts, but the non-detections at high metallicity (e.g. that of the DLA in J105744.5+062914) show that there is not a one-to-one relationship, and cautions us to not naively apply the properties of the DLA counterparts to all metal-rich DLAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据