4.7 Article

Toward accurate modelling of the non-linear matter bispectrum: standard perturbation theory and transients from initial conditions

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2525

关键词

cosmology: theory; large-scale structure of Universe

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate modelling of non-linearities in the galaxy bispectrum, the Fourier transform of the galaxy three-point correlation function, is essential to fully exploit it as a cosmological probe. In this paper, we present numerical and theoretical challenges in modelling the non-linear bispectrum. First, we test the robustness of the matter bispectrum measured from N-body simulations using different initial conditions generators. We run a suite of N-body simulations using the Zel'dovich approximation and second-order Lagrangian perturbation theory (2LPT) at different starting redshifts, and find that transients from initial decaying modes systematically reduce the non-linearities in the matter bispectrum. To achieve 1 per cent accuracy in the matter bispectrum at z <= 3 on scales k < 1 h Mpc(-1), 2LPT initial conditions generator with initial redshift z greater than or similar to 100 is required. We then compare various analytical formulas and empirical fitting functions for modelling the non-linear matter bispectrum, and discuss the regimes for which each is valid. We find that the next-to-leading order (one-loop) correction from standard perturbation theory matches with N-body results on quasi-linear scales for z >= 1. We find that the fitting formula in Gil-Marin et al. accurately predicts the matter bispectrum for z <= 1 on a wide range of scales, but at higher redshifts, the fitting formula given in Scoccimarro & Couchman gives the best agreement with measurements from N-body simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据