4.7 Article

On the validity of the ICFT R-matrix method: Fe XIV

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2016

关键词

atomic data; techniques: spectroscopic

资金

  1. STFC (UK) through the University of Cambridge DAMTP astrophysics grant
  2. University of Strathclyde UK APAP network grant [ST/J000892/1]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [C: 11273032]
  4. STFC [ST/J00054X/1, ST/J001570/1, PP/E004857/2, ST/L000636/1, ST/J000892/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E004857/2, ST/J001570/1, ST/J00054X/1, ST/L000636/1, ST/J000892/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, Aggarwal & Keenan published a Dirac R-matrix (DARC) calculation for the electron-impact excitation of Fe XIV. A 136-level configuration-interaction/close-coupling (CI/CC) expansion was adopted. Comparisons with earlier calculations, obtained by Liang et al. with the intermediate coupling frame transformation (ICFT) R-matrix method, showed significant discrepancies. One of the main differences was that the Liang et al. effective collision strengths were consistently larger. Aggarwal & Keenan suggested various possible causes for the differences. We discuss them in detail here. We have carried out an ICFT R-matrix calculation with the same 136-level CI/CC expansion adopted by Aggarwal & Keenan, and compared the results with theirs and with those of Liang et al., which employed a much larger CI/CC expansion. We find that the main differences arise because of the different CC and CI expansions, and not because of the use of the ICFT method, as suggested by Aggarwal & Keenan. The significant increase in the effective collision strengths obtained by Liang et al. is mainly due to the extra resonances that are present because of the larger target expansion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据