4.2 Review

Literature review of pain management for people with chronic pain

期刊

JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 167-183

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12065

关键词

chronic pain; pain management; review; self-efficacy; self-management

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25293462, 26293477] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimMultimodal approaches toward relieving pain, patients' participation, and improving self-efficacy are important for chronic pain management. The aims of this review were to identify possible options of nursing strategies for pain management in individuals with chronic pain and to determine the effectiveness of these strategies for pain relief/pain-related problems; therefore, nurses and researchers could consider and/or adopt multimodal chronic pain management strategies. MethodsA Systematic Integrated Literature Review was conducted. Published work related to pain management in individuals with chronic pain was identified by searching databases and reviewed. ResultsAmong the studies reviewed, we identified 35 studies that focused on pain management strategies. In 10 studies, interventions such as integrated and multidisciplinary pain management programs were associated with significant decreases in pain intensity. However, they reported that the long-term effectiveness of pain relief was not satisfactory. Individuals with chronic pain reported that strategies including pharmacotherapy, physical activity, social support from friends and family, acupuncture, heating, rest, diets, or life-style changes helped them to effectively manage their pain. ConclusionWe identified possible options of pain management strategies and explored effectiveness of chronic pain interventions. The long-term effects of pain relief interventions and social support for individuals with chronic pain require further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据