4.7 Article

Association Between Use of Interferon Beta and Progression of Disability in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

期刊

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.7625

关键词

-

资金

  1. endMS Research and Training Network
  2. European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis
  3. International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology
  4. Bayer Schering Pharma
  5. Aventis
  6. Bayer
  7. Biogen-Idec
  8. BioMS
  9. Corixa
  10. Genentech
  11. Novartis
  12. Serono
  13. Shering
  14. Talecris
  15. Teva-Neurosciences
  16. Biogen Idec
  17. Bayer Pharma
  18. Bayer Canada
  19. Bayhill Therapeutics
  20. BTG International
  21. Merck-Serono
  22. Consortium of MS Centres
  23. US National MS Society
  24. Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society
  25. University of British Columbia Multiple Sclerosis Research Program
  26. Bayer Pharmaceuticals
  27. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  28. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-93646]
  29. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS) [RG 4202-A-2]
  30. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  31. CIHR [MOP-93646]
  32. NMSS [RG 4202-A-2]
  33. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  34. Christopher Foundation
  35. University of British Columbia (UBC)
  36. Medical Services Commission of British Columbia
  37. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  38. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada (Don Paty Career Development Award)
  39. UK Multiple Sclerosis Trust
  40. NMSS
  41. Donald Paty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

context Interferon beta is widely prescribed to treat multiple sclerosis (MS); however, its relationship with disability progression has yet to be established. Objective To investigate the association between interferon beta exposure and disability progression in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Design, Setting, and Patients Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data (1985-2008) from British Columbia, Canada. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with interferon beta (n=868) were compared with untreated contemporary (n=829) and historical (n=959) cohorts. Main Outcome Measures The main outcome measure was time from interferon beta treatment eligibility (baseline) to a confirmed and sustained score of 6 (requiring a cane to walk 100 m; confirmed at >150 days with no measurable improvement) on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher disability). A multivariable Cox regression model with interferon beta treatment included as a time-varying covariate was used to assess the hazard of disease progression associated with interferon beta treatment. Analyses also included propensity score adjustment to address confounding by indication. Results The median active follow-up times (first to last EDSS measurement) were as follows: for the interferon beta-treated cohort, 5.1 years (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-7.0 years); for the contemporary control cohort, 4.0 years (IQR, 2.1-6.4 years); and for the historical control cohort, 10.8 years (IQR, 6.3-14.7 years). The observed outcome rates for reaching a sustained EDSS score of 6 were 10.8%, 5.3%, and 23.1% in the 3 cohorts, respectively. After adjustment for potential baseline confounders (sex, age, disease duration, and EDSS score), exposure to interferon beta was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the hazard of reaching an EDSS score of 6 when either the contemporary control cohort (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.92-1.83; P=.14) or the historical control cohort (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.02; P=.07) were considered. Further adjustment for comorbidities and socioeconomic status, where possible, did not change interpretations, and propensity score adjustment did not substantially change the results. Conclusion Among patients with relapsing-remitting MS, administration of interferon beta was not associated with a reduction in progression of disability. JAMA. 2012;308(3):247-256 www.jama.com

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据