4.7 Review

Risk of Incident Diabetes With Intensive-Dose Compared With Moderate-Dose Statin Therapy A Meta-analysis

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 305, 期 24, 页码 2556-2564

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.860

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb through the TIMI Study Group
  2. Merck
  3. Pfizer
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Roche
  7. Accumetrics
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Intekrin Therapeutics
  10. Takeda
  11. AstraZeneca through Brigham and Women's Hospital
  12. Bristol-Myers Squibb/sanofi-aventis
  13. Schering Plough
  14. Amgen
  15. Eli Lilly
  16. sanofi-aventis
  17. Novartis
  18. Boehringer Ingelheim
  19. Isis
  20. Genzyme
  21. Kowa
  22. Schering-Plough
  23. Novo Nordisk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that statin therapy is associated with excess risk of developing diabetes mellitus. Objective To investigate whether intensive-dose statin therapy is associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate-dose statin therapy. Data Sources We identified relevant trials in a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 1, 1996, through March 31, 2011). Unpublished data were obtained from investigators. Study Selection We included randomized controlled end-point trials that compared intensive-dose statin therapy with moderate-dose statin therapy and included more than 1000 participants who were followed up for more than 1 year. Data Extraction Tabular data provided for each trial described baseline characteristics and numbers of participants developing diabetes and experiencing major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, coronary revascularization). We calculated trial-specific odds ratios (ORs) for new-onset diabetes and major cardiovascular events and combined these using random-effects model meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I-2 statistic. Results In 5 statin trials with 32 752 participants without diabetes at baseline, 2749 developed diabetes (1449 assigned intensive-dose therapy, 1300 assigned moderate-dose therapy, representing 2.0 additional cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient years) and 6684 experienced cardiovascular events(3134 and 3550, respectively, representing 6.5 fewer cases in the intensive-dose group per 1000 patient-years) over a weighted mean (SD) follow-up of 4.9 (1.9) years. Odds ratios were 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.22; I-2 = 0%) for new-onset diabetes and 0.84(95% CI, 0.75-0.94; I-2 = 74%) for cardiovascular events for participants receiving intensive therapy compared with moderate-dose therapy. As compared with moderate-dose statin therapy, the number needed to harm per year for intensive-dose statin therapy was 498 for new-onset diabetes while the number needed to treat per year for intensive-dose statin therapy was 155 for cardiovascular events. Conclusion In a pooled analysis of data from 5 statin trials, intensive-dose statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes compared with moderate dose statin therapy. JAMA. 2011;305(24):2556-2564

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据