4.7 Article

Perceptions of Appropriateness of Care Among European and Israeli Intensive Care Unit Nurses and Physicians

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 306, 期 24, 页码 2694-2703

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.1888

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/European Critical Care Research Network (ESICM/ECCRN)
  2. Gilead
  3. Pfizer
  4. Merck, Sharp, and Dohme
  5. Astra-Zeneca
  6. Bayer
  7. General Electric
  8. Abbott Laboratories, Poland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs) who perceive the care they provide as inappropriate experience moral distress and are at risk for burnout. This situation may jeopardize patient quality of care and increase staff turnover. Objective To determine the prevalence of perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians and to identify patient-related situations, personal characteristics, and work-related characteristics associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional evaluation on May 11, 2010, of 82 adult ICUs in 9 European countries and Israel. Participants were 1953 ICU nurses and physicians providing bedside care. Main Outcome Measure Perceived inappropriateness of care, defined as a specific patient-care situation in which the clinician acts in a manner contrary to his or her personal and professional beliefs, as assessed using a questionnaire designed for the study. Results Of 1651 respondents (median response rate, 93% overall; interquartile range, 82%-100% [medians 93% among nurses and 100% among physicians]), perceived inappropriateness of care in at least 1 patient was reported by 439 clinicians overall (27%; 95% CI, 24%-29%), 300 of 1218 were nurses (25%), 132 of 407 were physicians (32%), and 26 had missing answers describing job title. Of these 439 individuals, 397 reported 445 situations associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. The most common reports were perceived disproportionate care (290 situations [65%; 95% CI, 58%-73%], of which too much care was reported in 89% of situations, followed by other patients would benefit more (168 situations [38%; 95% CI, 32%-43%]). Independently associated with perceived inappropriateness of care rates both among nurses and physicians were symptom control decisions directed by physicians only (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.56; P=.006); involvement of nurses in end-of-life decision making (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P=.02); good collaboration between nurses and physicians (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P=.009); and freedom to decide how to perform work-related tasks (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P=.002); while a high perceived workload was significantly associated among nurses only(OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P=.02). Perceived inappropriateness of care was independently associated with higher intent to leave a job (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.63; P=.03). In the subset of 69 ICUs for which patient data could be linked, clinicians reported received inappropriateness of care in 207 patients, representing 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%) of 883 ICU beds. Conclusion Among a group of European and Israeli ICU clinicians, perceptions of inappropriate care were frequently reported and were inversely associated with factors indicating good teamwork. JAMA. 2011;306(24):2694-2703

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据