4.7 Article

Primary Care Physician Workforce and Medicare Beneficiaries' Health Outcomes

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 305, 期 20, 页码 2096-2105

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.665

关键词

-

资金

  1. Texas Medical Association
  2. Health Action Council, Cincinnati
  3. Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
  4. Iowa Health Business Alliance
  5. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine
  6. American Medical Association
  7. Connecticut Children's Hospital
  8. Mt Sinai Hospital, New York
  9. World Congress
  10. Rutgers University
  11. Baystate Medical Center
  12. Brigham and Women's Hospital
  13. ESRI Inc
  14. Illinois Hospital Association
  15. National Hospice Workgroup
  16. National Association of Health Data Organizations
  17. St. Peters University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey
  18. Massachusetts Hospital Association
  19. Cooper Health System, Camden, New Jersey
  20. Organizzato dal Laboratorio Management e Sanita Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa
  21. Kentucky Academy of Family Physicians
  22. Southern Illinois University Health Policy Institute
  23. Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine
  24. Institute for Clinical Quality and Value
  25. Marwood Group
  26. American Society of Clinical Oncologists
  27. OR Manager
  28. Delta Health Alliance
  29. SUNY Upstate University
  30. Intermountain Healthcare
  31. Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration
  32. HealthDialog
  33. Colorado Foundation for Medical Care
  34. Seyferth Blumenthal and Harris
  35. American Medical Forensic Specialists
  36. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  37. National Institute on Aging [P01 AG19783]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Despite a widespread interest in increasing the numbers of primary care physicians to improve care and to moderate costs, the relationship of the primary care physician workforce to patient-level outcomes remains poorly understood. Objective To measure the association between the adult primary care physician workforce and individual patient outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional analysis of the outcomes of a 2007 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older (N=5 132 936), which used 2 measures of adult primary care physicians (general internists and family physicians) across Primary Care Service Areas (N=6542): (1) American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile nonfederal, office-based physicians per total population and (2) office-based primary care clinical full-time equivalents (FTEs) per Medicare beneficiary derived from Medicare claims. Main Outcome Measures Annual individual-level outcomes (mortality, ambulatory care sensitive condition [ACSC] hospitalizations, and Medicare program spending), adjusted for individual patient characteristics and geographic area variables. Results Marked variation was observed in the primary care physician workforce across areas, but low correlation was observed between the 2 primary care workforce measures (Spearman r=0.056; P<.001). Compared with areas with the lowest quintile of primary care physician measure using AMA Masterfile counts, beneficiaries in the highest quintile had fewer ACSC hospitalizations (74.90 vs 79.61 per 1000 beneficiaries; relative rate [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.95), lower mortality (5.38 vs 5.47 per 100 beneficiaries; RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.997), and no significant difference in total Medicare spending ($8722 vs $8765 per beneficiary; RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00). Beneficiaries residing in areas with the highest quintile of primary care clinician FTEs compared with those in the lowest quintile had lower mortality (5.19 vs 5.49 per 100 beneficiaries; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96), fewer ACSC hospitalizations (72.53 vs 79.48 per 1000 beneficiaries; RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92), and higher overall Medicare spending ($8857 vs $8769 per beneficiary; RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.004-1.02). Conclusion A higher level of primary care physician workforce, particularly with an FTE measure that may more accurately reflect ambulatory primary care, was generally associated with favorable patient outcomes. JAMA. 2011; 305(20): 2096-2105

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据