4.7 Article

How to interpret a genome-wide association study

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 299, 期 11, 页码 1335-1344

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.11.1335

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR024160, UL1 RR024160] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome- wide association ( GWA) studies use high- throughput genotyping technologies to assay hundreds of thousands of single- nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs) and relate them to clinical conditions and measurable traits. Since 2005, nearly 100 loci for as many as 40 common diseases and traits have been identified and replicated in GWA studies, many in genes not previously suspected of having a role in the disease under study, and some in genomic regions containing no known genes. GWA studies are an important advance in discovering genetic variants influencing disease but also have important limitations, including their potential for false- positive and false- negative results and for biases related to selection of study participants and genotyping errors. Although these studies are clearly many steps removed from actual clinical use, and specific applications of GWA findings in prevention and treatment are actively being pursued, at present these studies mainly represent a valuable discovery tool for examining genomic function and clarifying pathophysiologic mechanisms. This article describes the design, interpretation, application, and limitations of GWA studies for clinicians and scientists for whom this evolving science may have great relevance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据