4.3 Article

Linkage to HIV Care From a Mobile Testing Unit in South Africa by Different CD4 Count Strata

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31822e0c4c

关键词

mobile HIV testing unit; linkage to HIV and ART care; barriers to linkage to HIV care

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01 AI058736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The linkage and barriers of linkage to facility-based HIV care from a mobile HIV testing unit have not previously been described. Methods: A stratified random sample (N = 192) was drawn of all eligible, newly diagnosed, HIV-infected individuals with a laboratory CD4 count result on a mobile unit between August 2008 and December 2009. All individuals with CD4 counts <= 350 cells per microliter and 30% of individuals with CD4 counts >350 cells per microliter were sampled. Linkage to care was assessed during April to June 2010 in those who received their CD4 count result. A participant who accessed HIV care at least once after testing was regarded as having linked to care. Binomial regression models were used to identify clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with receiving a CD4 count result and linking to care. Results: Forty-three (27%) individuals did not receive their CD4 count result. A lower CD4 count, being female, and the availability of a phone number increased the likelihood of receiving this result. Follow-up was attempted in the remaining 145 individuals. Ten refused to participate, and contact was unsuccessful in 42.4%. Linkage was 100% in patients with CD4 counts <= 200 cells per microliter, 66.7% in individuals with CD4 counts 201-350 cells per microliter, and 36.4% in those with CD4 counts >350 cells per microliter. A lower CD4 count, disclosure, symptoms of tuberculosis, and unemployment increased the likelihood of linking to care. Conclusion: Linkage to care was best among those eligible for antiretroviral therapy. Interventions designed at improving linkage among employed individuals are urgently warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据