4.6 Article

Development of a Large Set of Microsatellite Markers in Zapote Mamey (Pouteria sapota (Jacq.) HE Moore & Stearn) and Their Potential Use in the Study of the Species

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 11400-11417

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/molecules200611400

关键词

blast analysis; founder effect; genetic diversity; germplasm; domestication; Mexico; SSR markers; genetic structure

资金

  1. USDA-ARS [6402-21310-004-00, 6635-21000-051-00, 6604-13210-005-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pouteria sapota is known for its edible fruits that contain unique carotenoids, as well as for its fungitoxic, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant activity. However, its genetics is mostly unknown, including aspects about its genetic diversity and domestication process. We did high-throughput sequencing of microsatellite-enriched libraries of P. sapota, generated 5223 contig DNA sequences, 1.8 Mbp, developed 368 microsatellites markers and tested them on 29 individuals from 10 populations (seven wild, three cultivated) from Mexico, its putative domestication center. Gene ontology BLAST analysis of the DNA sequences containing microsatellites showed potential association to physiological functions. Genetic diversity was slightly higher in cultivated than in the wild gene pool (H-E = 0.41 and H-E = 0.35, respectively), although modified Garza-Williamson Index and Bottleneck software showed evidence for a reduction in genetic diversity for the cultivated one. Neighbor Joining, 3D Principal Coordinates Analysis and assignment tests grouped most individuals according to their geographic origin but no clear separation was observed between wild or cultivated gene pools due to, perhaps, the existence of several admixed populations. The developed microsatellites have a great potential in genetic population and domestication studies of P. sapota but additional sampling will be necessary to better understand how the domestication process has impacted the genetic diversity of this fruit crop.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据