4.3 Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety of Candidate Microbicide SPL7013 Gel When Applied to the Penis

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318198a7e6

关键词

HIV prevention; microbicide; phase 1 clinical trial; SPL7013; VivaGel

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN266200500042C]
  4. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  5. Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship [400399]
  7. International Society of Sexually Transmitted Disease Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the safety of the candidate vaginal microbicide SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) when applied to the penis. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Thirty-six healthy men (18 circumcised, 18 uncircumcised) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio and treated with 3% SPL7013 gel (n = 24) or placebo gel (n = 12), applied once daily for 7 days. Genital toxicity was determined by interview, diary, and examination. Results: There were 10 genital adverse events (AEs) in 6 men (25%) receiving SPL7013 gel and 5 genital AEs in 4 men (33%) receiving the placebo that were possibly or probably related to the study product (difference of -8%, 95% confidence interval: -40% to 23%, P = 0.70). The most common genital AEs were genital pruritus and application site erythema. All genital AEs were mild (grade 1), and all but 1 in the placebo group were transient. Analysis of vital signs, nongenital AEs, and laboratory results indicated no safety or tolerability issues with SPL7013 gel, irrespective of circumcision status. There was no detectable absorption of SPL7013 into the plasma. Conclusions: Three percent SPL7013 gel was safe and well tolerated, and comparable with placebo, when administered to the penis of both circumcised and uncircumcised men once daily for 7 days, with no evidence of systemic absorption or toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据