4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

HIV Testing Rates and Outcomes in a South African Community, 2001-2006: Implications for Expanded Screening Policies

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a248e6

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P30 AI060354, P30 AI060354-07, R01 AI058736-07, K24 AI062476, K24 AI062476-05, R01 AI058736] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH065869, R01 MH065869-08, R01 MH073445-04, R01 MH073445] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Revised World Health Organization recommendations seek to increase HIV testing. We assessed the need for expanded testing in South Africa by examining current testing and treatment trends among a high prevalence population. Methods: We determined the numbers of adults receiving HIV testing and antiretroviral treatment (ART) during 2001-2006 using testing registers linked to patient records from 2 health care facilities believed responsible for virtually all HIV services available to the population. We evaluated annual population testing rates using census population counts; proportions of clients testing seropositive (yield); CD4 counts and World Health Organization stage at diagnosis; and ART initiation rates. Results: HIV testing rates rose from 4% in 2001 to 20% in 2006 (P < 0.001) and were highest among pregnant females receiving provider-initiated testing. Yield for first-time testers decreased from 47% in 2001 to 28% in 2006; annual incidence of seroconversion among initially HIV-negative. retesters was 1.9%. Median CD4 counts and World Health Organization stage distributions for newly diagnosed clients remained stable. HIV-infected clients receiving ART within 6 months of eligibility increased from 0% in 2001 to 68% in 2006 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Population testing and ART initiation rates rose dramatically during 2001-2006. Yet, yield remained high, and HIV-infected persons continued to receive late diagnoses. These findings highlight the continuing need for expanded testing and linkage to care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据