4.2 Article

Activity and kinetic properties of phosphotransacetylase from intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria

期刊

ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA
卷 62, 期 1, 页码 103-108

出版社

ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA
DOI: 10.18388/abp.2014_845

关键词

sulfate-reducing bacteria; phosphotransacetylase; kinetic analysis; inflammatory bowel diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphotransacetylase activity and the kinetic properties of the enzyme from intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfovibrio piger and Desulfomicrobium sp. has never been well-characterized and has not been studied yet. In this paper, the specific activity of phosphotransacetylase and the kinetic properties of the enzyme in cell-free extracts of both D. piger Vib-7 and Desulfomicrobium sp. Rod-9 intestinal bacterial strains were presented at the first time. The microbiological, biochemical, biophysical and statistical methods in this work were used. The optimal temperature and pH for enzyme reaction was determined. Analysis of the kinetic properties of the studied enzyme was carried out. Initial (instantaneous) reaction velocity (V-0), maximum amount of the product of reaction (P-max), the reaction time (half saturation period, tau) and maximum velocity of the phosphotransacetylase reaction (V-max) were defined. Michaelis constants (K-m) of the enzyme reaction (3.36 +/- 0.35 mM for D. piger Vib-7, 5.97 +/- 0.62 mM for Desulfomicrobium sp. Rod-9) were calculated. The studies of the phosphotransacetylase in the process of dissimilatory sulfate reduction and kinetic properties of this enzyme in intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria, their production of acetate in detail can be perspective for clarification of their etiological role in the development of the humans and animals bowel diseases. These studies might help in predicting the development of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, by providing further details on the etiology of bowel diseases which are very important for the clinical diagnosis of these disease types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据