4.6 Article

Contemporary Use and Effectiveness of N-Acetylcysteine in Preventing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

期刊

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 98-104

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.019

关键词

contrast-induced nephropathy; N-acetylcysteine; percutaneous coronary intervention

资金

  1. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
  2. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the use of and outcomes associated with use of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in real-world practice. Background The role of NAC in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is controversial, leading to widely varying recommendations for its use. Methods Use of NAC was assessed in consecutive patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention from 2006 to 2009 in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium, a large multicenter quality improvement collaborative. We examined the overall prevalence of NAC use in these patients and then used propensity matching to link its use with clinical outcomes, including CIN, nephropathy-requiring dialysis, and death. Results Of the 90,578 percutaneous coronary interventions performed during the study period, NAC was used in 10,574 (11.6%) procedures, with its use steadily increasing over the study period. Patients treated with NAC were slightly older and more likely to have baseline renal insufficiency and other comorbidities. In propensity-matched, risk-adjusted models, we found no differences in outcomes between patients treated with NAC and those not receiving NAC for CIN (5.5% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.99), nephropathy-requiring dialysis (0.6% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.69), or death (0.6% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.15). These findings were consistent across many prespecified subgroups. Conclusions Use of NAC is common and has steadily increased over the study period but does not seem to be associated with improved clinical outcomes in real-world practice. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:98-104) (C) 2012 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据