4.3 Review

The Proto-Ribosome: An Ancient Nano-machine for Peptide Bond Formation

期刊

ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 29-35

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201000012

关键词

evolving ribosomes; peptide bond formation; polymerase; RNA; ribozyme

资金

  1. US National Inst. of Health [GM34360]
  2. Kimmelman Center for Macromolecular Assemblies
  3. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ribosome is a ribozyme whose active site, the peptidyl transferase center (PTC), is situated within a highly conserved universal symmetrical region that connects all ribosomal functional centers involved in amino acid polymerization. The linkage between this elaborate architecture and A-site tRNA position revealed that the A- to P-site passage of the tRNA 3' terminus during protein synthesis is performed by a rotary motion, synchronized with the overall tRNA/mRNA sideways movement, and guided by the PTC. This rotary motion leads to suitable stereochemistry for peptide bond formation as well as for substrate-mediated catalysis. Analysis of the substrate binding modes to ribosomes led to the hypothesis that the ancient ribosome produced single peptide bonds and non-coded chains, potentially in a similar manner to the modern PTC. Later in evolution, a mechanism, enabling some type of decoding genetic control triggered the emergence of the small ribosomal subunit or part of it. This seems to be the result of the appearance of reaction products that could have evolved after polypeptides capable of enzymatic function were generated sporadically, while an ancient stable RNA fold was converted into an old version of a tRNA molecule. Since in the contemporary ribosome, the symmetry relates only to the backbone fold and nucleotide orientations but not nucleotide sequences, it emphasizes the superiority of functional requirement over sequence conservation, and indicates that the PTC may have evolved by gene fusion or gene duplication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据